Reeves CAD 2025 MAP Review: Four Passes and Two Recommendations
The Reeves CAD 2025 final MAP report separates four mandatory results, four review-area scores, and two recommendations from any property-specific conclusion.
Read the post →Texas Oil & Gas mineral rights articles: Page 2
Permian Basin, Eagle Ford, and other Texas play context for mineral rights owners.
105 published articles · Page 2 of 5
Reeves County 2024 Category G Worksheets: Two ISDs, Strata, and Ratios
The Reeves County 2024 final-findings route separates Category G worksheets by school district, then separates property rows, G1 strata, stratum totals, and category totals inside each worksheet.
Read the post →
Pecos CAD Pipeline Appraisal Models: RCNLD, Unit Value, and Land
Pecos CAD's plan describes a pipeline RCNLD baseline, a conditional whole-system unit-value route, component allocation, and separate land treatment.
Read the post →
Pecos CAD Industrial Appraisal Limits: Title, Inspection, and Sketches
Pecos CAD's plan states assumptions and limits for industrial appraisals, including title, inspection, sketch, purpose, and hidden-condition boundaries.
Read the post →
Pecos CAD Oil and Gas Review: Infrequent Sales and Multi-Site Limits
Pecos CAD’s plan describes annual oil-and-gas appraisal review and explains why infrequent, nonpublic, bundled sales can limit appraisal-to-sales analysis.
Read the post →
Pecos CAD Oil and Gas Property Discovery: RRCID, Permit, and January 1
The Pecos plan describes an RRCID-to-permit discovery sequence and three January 1 tests, but those statements do not establish a current property result.
Read the post →
Pecos CAD 2025-2026 Reappraisal Plan: Category G Parcel Counts by ISD
The plan prints separate Category G parcel estimates for 2025 Buena Vista ISD and 2026 Fort Stockton ISD, not a county total or owner-level result.
Read the post →
Midland CAD 2025-2026 Mineral Work Calendar: January 1 Snapshot to July Certification
The plan prints mineral valuation from January through May, but its January 1 effective date and later workflow are document statements, not proof of an owner-level result.
Read the post →
Midland CAD 2026 Appraisal Services RFP: Mineral Scope and Date-Control Crosswalk
The official RFP prints different proposal dates on physical pages 4, 8, and 22. Preserve each string, treat the conflict as unresolved, and verify current instructions with Midland CAD.
Read the post →
Midland CAD 2026 Certified Mineral Roll ZIP: File Order, Formats, and Privacy Limits
Start with Midland CAD’s file-layout PDF, use the recap only for aggregates, and stop before opening owner-level TXT or CSV rows without a defined need and privacy plan.
Read the post →
Midland CAD Open Records Page: Mineral Files, Rolls, and Notices as Separate Source Routes
Midland CAD places its preliminary mineral roll, certified mineral roll, and mineral notices in different Open Records sections. Those routes do not validate a property record.
Read the post →
Midland CAD 2025 Report: 419,660 Mineral Interest Accounts on PDF Page 25
Midland CAD’s 2025 report places an approximately 419,660 mineral interest accounts statement on physical PDF page 25. The figure is not a count of owners, tracts, wells, acreage, or current accounts.
Read the post →
Midland CAD Mineral Property Page: Three Approaches and the Sufficient-Data Condition
Midland CAD names three mineral property appraisal approaches, but its page conditions their consideration on sufficient data and does not identify an account-specific method.
Read the post →
Martin CAD Property Search: Lease Fields Are Search Inputs, Not Ownership Proof
Use Martin CAD lease and property-search fields to reproduce a retrieval route, then stop before treating the interface as ownership or title proof.
Read the post →
Martin CAD 2025-26 Reappraisal Plan: Mineral Work and the Separate P&A Plan
Find the Martin CAD general plan’s mineral-work handoff, then keep the separate contractor plan as its own unresolved source identity.
Read the post →
Martin CAD 2025-26 MIUP Plan: Mineral Interests, Not Minerals in Place
Locate the Martin CAD MIUP plan’s mineral-interest section, then keep its interest-versus-mineral wording inside the plan’s source boundary.
Read the post →
Martin CAD 2025 Category G Row: Oil & Gas Parcel Count and Market-Value Boundary
Find the Martin CAD 2025 Category G oil-and-gas row, then keep its parcel count and market value within the report-level aggregate boundary.
Read the post →
Martin CAD 2026 Mineral Archive: Certified Link vs Preliminary PDF Label
Preserve the Martin CAD certified-link versus preliminary-PDF conflict as two separate observations, then route the status question without exposing record pages.
Read the post →
Loving CAD 2026 Year-by-Year Appraisals PDF: Selection Page and File Boundary
Use the page-1 selection map for the Loving CAD 2026 year-by-year appraisals PDF without exposing or interpreting record-specific report pages.
Read the post →
Loving CAD 2026 Mineral File Layout PDF: Eight-Page Position and EOF Map
Use an eight-page physical locator for the Loving CAD 2026 mineral file-layout PDF while preserving its unresolved SITUS and EOF boundary mismatch.
Read the post →
Loving CAD 2026 Mineral Recap PDF: Three-Page Column and Jurisdiction Map
Use a physical-page map to locate the official Loving CAD 2026 mineral recap labels without converting them into value or property conclusions.
Read the post →
Loving CAD 2026 Certified Mineral Roll ZIP: PDF, TXT, and CSV Member Map
Map the exact seven members in the Loving CAD 2026 mineral-roll ZIP while keeping file identity separate from data meaning or property conclusions.
Read the post →
Loving CAD 2026 Mass Appraisal Report: Mineral-Assistance Roster Page Crosswalk
Crosswalk the Loving CAD 2026 report roster from physical PDF page 11 to printed page 10 without turning document labels into current-status or property claims.
Read the post →
Karnes CAD 2026 Certified Mineral Roll ZIP: Seven-Member Container Index
Preserve the Karnes CAD 2026 mineral-roll ZIP identity and seven-member container inventory without opening or applying member data.
Read the post →Want a transparent review of your specific situation?
A free, confidential underwriter review. The output is a directional range with the assumptions stated. No card. No obligation.
No card required. No obligation. Confidential review.