Pecos CAD 2025-2026 Reappraisal Plan: Category G Parcel Counts by ISD

Direct answer for mineral owners

Pecos CAD’s plan prints a Category G Real: Oil, Gas and Other Minerals estimate of 20,005 for 2025 Buena Vista ISD and 78,200 for 2026 Fort Stockton ISD. Keep the figures separate by year and school district. They are planning estimates, not a county total, certified roll, or owner-level count.

Key takeaways for mineral owners

• The official PDF is 971,223 bytes with SHA-256 c95d84641a0d024c04b9d8ba491e5972085b29a05a9aba4038128d78e8e12d01.
• Physical page 2 schedules Buena Vista ISD real property for 2025 and Fort Stockton ISD for 2026.
• Physical page 37 labels its figures Estimated Parcel Counts by ISD and prints the Category G row as 20,005 and 78,200.
• The all-category totals of 28,038 and 101,979 are separate from the Category G row.
• Do not sum the two Category G figures or convert them into owners, wells, leases, tracts, mineral interests, certified records, values, or results.

Official-plan table locator, not an owner or certified-roll result. This article records the labels and figures printed in Pecos County Appraisal District’s 2025-2026 Reappraisal Plan. It does not prove that planned work was completed, that an estimate became a certified count, or that a named owner, well, lease, tract, mineral interest, account, notice, tax bill, value, offer, or transaction is represented. MRX provides educational information and resources only and does not buy mineral rights.

The direct answer is: physical page 37 prints two separate Category G estimates. The table places 20,005 under 2025 Buena Vista ISD and 78,200 under 2026 Fort Stockton ISD for G Real: Oil, Gas and Other Minerals. The table heading says Estimated Parcel Counts by ISD.

Keep the year, school district, Category G label, estimate status, and physical-page locator attached to each figure. Do not add the figures as a Pecos County total or convert them into a different unit.

Direct answer: the two Category G table cells

Plan year	ISD	Physical page 37 label	Printed estimate	What it does not establish
2025	Buena Vista ISD	G Real: Oil, Gas and Other Minerals	20,005	Owners, wells, leases, tracts, interests, completion, or status
2026	Fort Stockton ISD	G Real: Oil, Gas and Other Minerals	78,200	Owners, wells, leases, tracts, interests, completion, or status

The official Pecos CAD Data and Records page links the 2025-2026 Reappraisal Plan PDF. The page-37 cells are plan-table statements. They are not a current account search, certified roll, mineral-interest inventory, or title record.

Bind the exact source before using a figure

The controlled PDF retrieved for this review is 971,223 bytes with SHA-256 c95d84641a0d024c04b9d8ba491e5972085b29a05a9aba4038128d78e8e12d01. It has 75 physical pages, is unencrypted, and contains no embedded JavaScript. Its metadata records creation on August 8, 2024 and modification on September 2, 2024.

Physical page 1 prints Approved by Board of Directors August 19, 2024. That is a literal cover statement, not independent proof of legal validity, later implementation, current status, or controlling effect.

The file controls make a citation reproducible. They do not validate a table estimate or connect it to one owner or property.

How physical page 2 connects years to school districts

Physical page 2 says all real property in Buena Vista ISD will be reappraised in 2025 and all real property in Fort Stockton ISD will be reappraised in 2026. It schedules Iraan/Sheffield ISD for 2027 and points readers to Exhibit A for the proposed 2025 and 2026 work schedules and category breakdown.

That sequence explains why physical page 37 presents the first two columns as:

• 2025 Buena Vista ISD; and
• 2026 Fort Stockton ISD.

The schedule remains plan language. It does not prove that every real or personal property was reappraised, that the figures were later certified, or that the same figures are current.

Texas Tax Code Chapter 25 supplies periodic-reappraisal-plan and appraisal-roll context. This article does not interpret an owner’s duty, apply law to an account, determine a deadline, or decide whether Pecos CAD satisfied a requirement.

Category G and the all-category totals are different rows

Physical page 37 prints more than the Category G row. It also prints an all-category Totals row:

Column	Category G estimate	All-category total
2025 Buena Vista ISD	20,005	28,038
2026 Fort Stockton ISD	78,200	101,979

The all-category totals include the table’s other displayed property categories. They are not alternate Category G figures. This article does not calculate a percentage, ratio, combined total, trend, or explanation from the four cells.

The Pecos CAD homepage says mineral, utility, and industrial accounts are appraised for the district by Thos. Y. Pickett and Company. That homepage statement identifies a district role. It does not define what one page-37 “parcel” means, confirm the estimates, or establish any owner-level record.

Keep physical page 40 separate from physical page 37

Physical page 40 begins a separately titled Oil and Gas Reserves appraisal-procedures appendix. It states that the contractor annually reappraises producing mineral leases and describes January 1 tax-appraisal context.

That appendix is useful for locating a different part of the plan. It does not say that the page-37 Category G row counts producing mineral leases. It also does not authorize changing “Estimated Parcel Counts by ISD” into wells, leases, tracts, owners, producing properties, mineral interests, or appraisal records.

The safe rule is simple: use page 37 for the table label and figures; do not borrow a different section’s noun to redefine the table unit.

A source-preserving verification sequence

Use this sequence when a Category G figure appears in a memo, spreadsheet, or research note:

1. Record the official route. Save the Data and Records page and the PDF URL.
2. Bind the file. Record retrieval time, byte size, SHA-256, page count, encryption status, and JavaScript status.
3. Cite physical page 37. Preserve the table heading and Category G row wording.
4. Keep each column intact. Pair 20,005 with 2025 Buena Vista ISD and 78,200 with 2026 Fort Stockton ISD.
5. Keep “estimated” visible. Do not relabel a plan estimate as current, actual, completed, final, or certified.
6. Do not sum the two figures. The source does not label their sum as a county total.
7. Do not change units. If a later task requires owner, account, well, lease, tract, mineral-interest, or certified-roll counts, retrieve the source that expressly reports that unit.
8. Verify current status separately. Use Pecos CAD’s current official records for a live account, notice, certified roll, protest, or tax-appraisal question.
9. Use title and transaction evidence separately. An appraisal-plan table cannot prove ownership, title, private value, an offer, or a sale result.

What the table does not answer

Unsupported conclusion	Separate evidence still required
20,005 or 78,200 owners hold mineral rights	Owner-level account records, identity controls, and current title evidence
The figures count wells or producing leases	A source that expressly defines and reports that unit
The two figures form one Pecos County total	An official source that labels a county-wide total and explains its period
Every planned reappraisal was completed	Work records, contractor deliverables, district acceptance, and current proof
The estimates equal counts in a certified roll	Certified-roll files, category definitions, version, as-of date, and reconciliation
A particular mineral interest has a stated value	Account evidence, interest data, appraisal inputs, as-of date, and qualified review
The difference between columns has one cause	A supported methodology, comparable scope, and evidence for causal attribution
A private offer should match a tax appraisal table	Property, title, lease, production, risk, market, buyer, and transaction evidence

For a different county and a different Category G job, use Martin CAD 2025 Category G Row: Oil & Gas Parcel Count and Market-Value Boundary. For Pecos County, this page owns only the 2025-2026 plan’s year-and-ISD estimate crosswalk.

Evidence claim ledger and source status

Claim ID	Evidence label	Controlled observation	Boundary
C287-01	ROUTING-ONLY	Pecos CAD’s Data and Records page links the 2025-2026 Reappraisal Plan.	A link does not prove implementation, completion, certification, or an owner result.
C287-02	VERIFIED-OBSERVATION	The PDF is 971,223 bytes, SHA-256 c95d84...12d01, unencrypted, without JavaScript, and 75 pages.	File controls bind retrieved bytes; they do not validate a count or result.
C287-03	SOURCE-STATEMENT	Physical page 1 prints board approval on August 19, 2024.	A cover statement does not prove later implementation or current status.
C287-04	SOURCE-STATEMENT	Physical page 2 pairs Buena Vista ISD with 2025, Fort Stockton ISD with 2026, and Iraan/Sheffield ISD with 2027.	The schedule is plan text, not proof of completed work.
C287-05	SOURCE-STATEMENT	Physical page 37 labels its table Estimated Parcel Counts by ISD.	The table label does not establish a current or certified result.
C287-06	SOURCE-STATEMENT	The Category G row prints 20,005 for 2025 Buena Vista ISD and 78,200 for 2026 Fort Stockton ISD.	The figures remain separate estimates and are not added or converted to another unit.
C287-07	SOURCE-STATEMENT	The all-category Totals row prints 28,038 and 101,979 in the two separate columns.	The totals are not Category G figures and are not treated as a county total.
C287-08	SOURCE-BOUNDARY	Physical page 40 begins a separate oil-and-gas-reserves appendix.	The appendix does not define page 37’s parcel unit or authorize a cross-unit inference.
C287-09	CONTEXT-ONLY	Texas Tax Code Chapter 25 supplies periodic-reappraisal-plan and appraisal-roll context.	The law is not applied to an owner or account and does not prove completion or certification.
C287-10	NON-VALIDATING	No owner record, account file, notice, certified roll, title instrument, tax bill, appraisal, value file, offer, or transaction was treated as proven.	Current and owner-specific status requires separate official evidence.

Retrieval, originality, and creative evidence

The exact replacement title and slug were absent before implementation. The nearest current title is Culberson CAD 2025-2026 Reappraisal Plan Adoption Source Record at token-Jaccard 0.3125. That article owns Culberson plan-adoption provenance. The Martin and Karnes Category G pages use different counties, years, source documents, tables, and evidence jobs. This article owns the Pecos plan’s two-column Category G estimate crosswalk.

Physical pages 1, 2, 37, and 40 were rendered and visually checked. The dark low-oblique hero and bright strict-overhead inline composition were independently generated. Deterministic typography adds the exact canonical title to the hero and the exact primary keyword to the inline image. The two source images and public WebPs are distinct binaries.

Sources reviewed for this article

• Pecos CAD Data and Records page
• Pecos CAD 2025-2026 Reappraisal Plan
• Pecos County Appraisal District homepage
• Texas Tax Code Chapter 25

If the table matters to a current account, certified roll, notice, protest, appraisal, title, tax, value, or transaction question, use the current official record for that exact job rather than this plan table as the final authority.

Frequently asked questions

Where are the Pecos CAD Category G parcel counts in the plan?

Physical page 37 contains the Estimated Parcel Counts by ISD table and its Category G Real: Oil, Gas and Other Minerals row.

Which figure belongs to 2025 Buena Vista ISD?

The table prints 20,005 in the 2025 Buena Vista ISD column for Category G. It labels the number as an estimate in the plan.

Which figure belongs to 2026 Fort Stockton ISD?

The table prints 78,200 in the 2026 Fort Stockton ISD column for Category G. It does not identify that figure as a current certified count.

Can the two Category G figures be added as a Pecos County total?

This article does not add them. The plan presents separate year-and-ISD columns, and it does not label their sum as a county total.

Are these counts of owners, wells, leases, or mineral interests?

The table says Estimated Parcel Counts by ISD and does not define the Category G row as counts of owners, wells, leases, tracts, producing properties, or individual mineral interests.

Sources reviewed for this article

• Pecos CAD Data and Records page (accessed 2026-08-31)
• Pecos CAD 2025-2026 Reappraisal Plan (accessed 2026-08-31)
• Pecos County Appraisal District homepage (accessed 2026-08-31)
• Texas Tax Code Chapter 25 (accessed 2026-08-31)