Publication responsibility
The Mineral Rights Xchange publishing organization responsible for article sourcing, review, updates, and publication standards.
MRX is responsible for Learning Center sourcing, review, updates, and publication. Guide personas are fictional AI interfaces, not article authors or human professionals. Read the published methodology and limitations →Author archive
Page 2 of 15
The Ward CAD 2025-2026 reappraisal plan has one district mineral section and a second contractor section in Appendix B, each with a different printed page range.
Read article →Ward CAD defines Mineral Property for one 2026-2029 appraisal-services contract, lists related interests, excludes specified non-fuel materials, and keeps Personal Property separate.
Read article →The Ward CAD 2026 mineral ZIP has seven entries on three calendar dates, but its member numbers and timestamp fields do not establish publication chronology.
Read article →The Ward and Loving CAD 2026 archives contain a byte-identical layout PDF, but their publisher pages and outer archives remain separate evidence lanes.
Read article →Read the exact Ward CAD 2026 mineral recap district row without converting a public appraisal aggregate into an owner count or private sale value.
Read article →Keep the Upton plan’s coverage, print, appraisal-snapshot, and embedded-appendix dates in separate evidence lanes.
Read article →Follow the Upton CAD plan’s printed sequence from source categories and calibration to individual review and its stated state performance test.
Read article →Verify the Upton CAD 2024 G1 plus G1C arithmetic against G*, then keep that subtotal separate from the report’s larger mineral recap.
Read article →Read Upton CAD’s local policy and current Texas OAG guidance as separate layers, then preserve every request, response, clarification, and charge discrepancy.
Read article →Treat Upton CAD’s TXT and CSV members as separate source objects, preserve exact bytes, and stop before owner-row inspection or unsupported schema conclusions.
Read article →Separate field-specific rows from standard fallback rows, preserve dates and source labels, and verify current applicability outside the historical export.
Read article →Read RRC field class and field-type rows in their exact source context, then resolve an associated field number without turning the pointer into property evidence.
Read article →Convert source-specific RRC district values only through the dictionary that defines them, while retaining the raw value and every provenance field.
Read article →RRC district codes, county codes, field numbers, field names, and page-specific FIPS codes are separate source labels and should not share one field.
Read article →A CAD account number, API number, RRC lease or gas-well ID, district, and P-5 operator number identify different record objects and should not share one field.
Read article →Tax year, production month, processed-data status, and download date answer different record questions and should never share one date field.
Read article →Reeves appears in the official 2025 MAP list, not the 2025 appraisal-district ratio-study list; the official 2024 findings retain the Reeves worksheet route.
Read article →The Reeves CAD 2024 ratio-study summary displays 66 Category G ratios and six adjacent aggregate fields that must remain inside their official district-study context.
Read article →The Reeves County 2025 preliminary PVS routes to two separate ISD summaries whose Category G rows must remain attached to their districts and public-study purpose.
Read article →The Reeves CAD 2025 final MAP report separates four mandatory results, four review-area scores, and two recommendations from any property-specific conclusion.
Read article →The Reeves County 2024 final-findings route separates Category G worksheets by school district, then separates property rows, G1 strata, stratum totals, and category totals inside each worksheet.
Read article →Pecos CAD's plan describes a pipeline RCNLD baseline, a conditional whole-system unit-value route, component allocation, and separate land treatment.
Read article →Pecos CAD's plan states assumptions and limits for industrial appraisals, including title, inspection, sketch, purpose, and hidden-condition boundaries.
Read article →Pecos CAD’s plan describes annual oil-and-gas appraisal review and explains why infrequent, nonpublic, bundled sales can limit appraisal-to-sales analysis.
Read article →