Reeves County 2025 Preliminary PVS: Two Category G Totals

Direct answer for mineral owners

The official Reeves County 2025 preliminary PVS index routes to separate Pecos-Barstow-Toyah ISD and Balmorhea ISD summary worksheets. Their Category G rows show 23,324,129,394 and 288,604,250, respectively, for local tax roll value and value assigned; both show WTD mean ratio as N/A and state that local value was valid and certified. Keep the figures separate. They are school-district PVS fields, not a private mineral-interest value.

Key takeaways for mineral owners

• The Reeves preliminary index links two separate school-district summary worksheets.
• Pecos-Barstow-Toyah ISD and Balmorhea ISD have separate Category G rows that should not be added or blended.
• Each Category G row shows the same figure in local tax roll value, PTAD value estimate, and value assigned, with WTD mean ratio marked N/A.
• The local-value-valid statement certifies a school-district PVS result, not an individual mineral account or private market value.
• The 2025 preliminary findings and Article 292’s 2024 final Category G worksheets are different evidence objects.

Public school-district study, not a private mineral appraisal. This article reports bounded fields from official Texas Comptroller PVS pages. It does not establish title, ownership, acreage, an individual mineral account, appraisal correctness, a tax bill, protest rights, market value, a private mineral-interest value, an offer, or a transaction result. MRX provides educational information and resources only and does not buy mineral rights.

The direct answer is: the Reeves County 2025 preliminary PVS index routes to two separate school-district summary worksheets. The Reeves County portion of Pecos-Barstow-Toyah ISD shows a Category G figure of 23,324,129,394; Balmorhea ISD shows 288,604,250. On each page, that district figure appears in the local tax roll value, PTAD value estimate, and value assigned columns, while the WTD mean ratio is N/A. Keep the two rows separate and do not treat either as an owner-level mineral value.

Direct answer: preserve the district before the number

The shortest reliable citation record has four parts: 2025 preliminary, Reeves County, the exact school district, and Category G - All Minerals. If one part is removed, the number becomes easier to misuse.

District route	Category G local tax roll value	WTD mean ratio	PTAD value estimate	Value assigned
Pecos-Barstow-Toyah ISD, Reeves County portion	23,324,129,394	N/A	23,324,129,394	23,324,129,394
Balmorhea ISD, Reeves County	288,604,250	N/A	288,604,250	288,604,250

This table reproduces the two official rows without publishing a combined total. The rows belong to different school-district routes. Adding them would create a new aggregation that neither source page presents.

Start with what the PVS is for

The Texas Comptroller School District Property Value Study overview explains that the study estimates taxable property value for school districts and that the commissioner of education uses the results in distributing public-education funding. That purpose controls how the data should be described.

A PVS summary is not a private mineral appraisal. It does not say what a particular owner holds, where the interest lies, what decimal applies, whether production is attributable to that interest, what burdens attach, or what a buyer might offer. Its public-administration purpose is different from a private transaction question.

Confirm the preliminary edition and county split

The official 2025 Preliminary Findings page labels the edition preliminary and says the information was certified to the commissioner of education on January 30, 2026. It also states that when a school district overlaps two or more counties, the findings are split so that a county presentation includes only property located within that county.

That boundary is especially important for Pecos-Barstow-Toyah ISD. Its all-splits navigation names both Reeves and Ward counties, while the relevant worksheet section is explicitly labeled 195-Reeves/Reeves County. A citation should retain that county section instead of describing the displayed row as an undifferentiated district-wide number.

The preliminary page also states a 40-day petition period for a school district or eligible taxpayer. This article does not interpret who qualifies, calculate a deadline, or turn the PVS petition process into an owner-level property-tax protest instruction.

Use the Reeves index as a routing record

The official Reeves County 2025 preliminary index lists two district sections:

1. 195-901 Pecos-Barstow-Toyah ISD (split district); and
2. 195-902 Balmorhea ISD.

Each section has its own School District Summary Worksheet link and its own Deduction Detail link. The index therefore answers a routing question: which district evidence object should be opened? It does not supply a mineral account, an owner name, or a private-value conclusion.

A practical capture note should record the index URL, the route label clicked, the destination URL, the retrieval time and timezone, and the exact county-and-district heading on the destination page. That creates a checkable path from the county index to the quoted row.

Read the Pecos-Barstow-Toyah row in place

The Pecos-Barstow-Toyah ISD 2025 summary worksheet presents multiple geographic sections. In the 195-Reeves/Reeves County section, the Category G - All Minerals row displays:

• local tax roll value: 23,324,129,394;
• 2025 WTD mean ratio: N/A;
• 2025 PTAD value estimate: 23,324,129,394; and
• 2025 value assigned: 23,324,129,394.

Near the end of that Reeves County section, the page states that the SDPVS found local value valid and certified local value. Preserve that wording as a school-district study result. It does not certify a named owner’s title, mineral acreage, division-order decimal, appraisal notice, tax amount, or private market price.

Do not substitute the page’s Ward County section or its all-splits navigation label for the Reeves County row. The repeated district name is not enough; the county subsection is part of the evidence identity.

Read the Balmorhea row as a separate object

The Balmorhea ISD 2025 summary worksheet identifies 195-Reeves/Reeves County and 195-902/Balmorhea ISD. Its Category G - All Minerals row displays:

• local tax roll value: 288,604,250;
• 2025 WTD mean ratio: N/A;
• 2025 PTAD value estimate: 288,604,250; and
• 2025 value assigned: 288,604,250.

The Balmorhea page also states that the PVS found local value valid and certified local value. Treat this as a separate district result. Do not merge it into the Pecos-Barstow-Toyah row merely because both appear under Reeves County.

Do not translate N/A into zero

Both Category G rows display N/A in the WTD mean-ratio column. Report that field exactly as N/A. It is not 0, and this article does not infer a missing-data error, a perfect ratio, a failed ratio, or a private valuation conclusion from it.

The adjacent equality among local tax roll value, PTAD value estimate, and value assigned is also a displayed worksheet fact. It should not be reframed as proof that any individual mineral account is correct. The district-level certification sentence and the owner-level evidence question remain different things.

Use a retrieval record that survives quotation

For a citation-ready note, capture these fields:

Field	Entry rule
Study edition	2025 preliminary PVS
County section	Exact heading, including county number and name
District	Exact district number and name
Category	G - All Minerals
Displayed fields	Local tax roll, WTD mean ratio, PTAD estimate, value assigned
Certification wording	Quote or paraphrase only with the district context attached
Retrieval evidence	URL, date, time, timezone, and saved evidence pointer
Stop condition	No owner-level inference without separate property evidence

This structure gives search and answer systems a concise fact block while keeping qualifiers adjacent to the figures. It also lets a human reviewer trace every claim back to the correct district page.

Keep the adjacent Reeves articles in their lanes

Use Reeves County 2024 Category G Worksheets: Two ISDs, Strata, and Ratios when the question concerns the 2024 final minerals worksheets, sample property rows, strata, and ratio tables. Article 294 uses a different year, a preliminary edition, and summary worksheets rather than the detailed Category G worksheets.

Use Reeves CAD 2025 MAP Review: Four Passes and Two Recommendations for district governance and operating-process review results. Use Reeves County Mineral Records: A Source-by-Source Search Log for clerk, CAD, GLO, and RRC search separation.

Those boundaries matter for retrieval quality. A page should answer one evidence job cleanly instead of repeating a broad county valuation promise.

Controlled retrieval record

The five official source objects were retrieved on August 31, 2026 and retained as 672,293 controlled bytes.

Source object	Bytes	SHA-256 prefix	Role
PVS overview	132,588	77a50cad6336	Program purpose and findings structure
2025 preliminary findings	140,457	3f87ac263c2e	Certification and county-split boundary
Reeves index	118,654	823ca8057737	Two district routes
Pecos-Barstow-Toyah summary	144,910	422f817b146d	Reeves Category G row
Balmorhea summary	135,684	d6e78349ba1d	Separate Category G row

Claim ledger and stop conditions

Claim ID	Supported statement	Allowed evidence label	Stop condition
C294-01	PVS serves a school-district public-funding purpose	PROGRAM-SCOPE	Do not describe it as a private appraisal program
C294-02	The edition is the 2025 preliminary findings	EDITION-IDENTITY	Do not relabel it as final findings
C294-03	Overlapping district findings are split by county	COUNTY-SPLIT	Do not merge county sections
C294-04	Reeves index has two district summary routes	ROUTE-INVENTORY	Do not infer owner or account coverage
C294-05	PBTISD Reeves Category G row is 23,324,129,394	DISTRICT-SUMMARY	Do not call it a private value
C294-06	Balmorhea Category G row is 288,604,250	DISTRICT-SUMMARY	Do not add it to another district row
C294-07	Both displayed WTD mean ratios are N/A	DISPLAYED-FIELD	Do not translate N/A into zero
C294-08	Each page states local value was valid and certified	CERTIFICATION-WORDING	Do not claim property-specific approval
C294-09	The two figures remain separate	NO-AGGREGATION	Do not publish an unsupported combined number
C294-10	No worksheet identifies an owner-level value	DOCUMENT-CONTENT	Require separate property evidence

Before applying any of these public-study facts to a particular mineral interest, obtain separate evidence for the owner, legal description, account, interest type, decimal, production relationship, appraisal notice, and the question actually being evaluated. The PVS rows do not supply those facts.

Practical conclusion for mineral owners

The Reeves County 2025 preliminary PVS is not one undifferentiated mineral-value page. It is a county routing index with separate district evidence objects. Preserve the district, county section, preliminary edition, Category G label, displayed columns, N/A ratio field, and certification context every time a figure is cited.

For a broader source map, use the Texas Mineral Rights Guide. Keep the two PVS rows separate from title, ownership, property-tax, offer, and private-value evidence.

Frequently asked questions

What does the Reeves County 2025 preliminary PVS index link to?

It links to separate summary worksheets for Pecos-Barstow-Toyah ISD and Balmorhea ISD, along with separate deduction-detail routes.

What Category G figure appears for Pecos-Barstow-Toyah ISD in Reeves County?

The Reeves County portion of the 2025 preliminary summary shows 23,324,129,394 for Category G local tax roll value, PTAD value estimate, and value assigned.

What Category G figure appears for Balmorhea ISD?

The 2025 preliminary Balmorhea ISD summary shows 288,604,250 for Category G local tax roll value, PTAD value estimate, and value assigned.

Should the two Category G figures be added together?

No. This article preserves each figure with its own district route and does not publish a combined amount. A combined number would answer a different question and would require a separately defined aggregation method.

Do the Category G totals show what an owner’s mineral rights are worth?

No. They are school-district PVS fields. They do not identify an owner, establish title or acreage, appraise an individual account, calculate a tax bill, or state private market value.

Sources reviewed for this article

• Texas Comptroller School District Property Value Study overview (accessed 2026-08-31)
• Texas Comptroller 2025 Preliminary PVS Findings (accessed 2026-08-31)
• Texas Comptroller Reeves County 2025 Preliminary Findings index (accessed 2026-08-31)
• Texas Comptroller Pecos-Barstow-Toyah ISD 2025 Summary Worksheet (accessed 2026-08-31)
• Texas Comptroller Balmorhea ISD 2025 Summary Worksheet (accessed 2026-08-31)