Pecos CAD Oil and Gas Property Discovery: RRCID, Permit, and January 1
The Pecos plan describes an RRCID-to-permit discovery sequence and three January 1 tests, but those statements do not establish a current property result.
Read article →Publication responsibility
The Mineral Rights Xchange publishing organization responsible for article sourcing, review, updates, and publication standards.
MRX is responsible for Learning Center sourcing, review, updates, and publication. Guide personas are fictional AI interfaces, not article authors or human professionals. Read the published methodology and limitations →Author archive
Page 3 of 15
The Pecos plan describes an RRCID-to-permit discovery sequence and three January 1 tests, but those statements do not establish a current property result.
Read article →The plan prints separate Category G parcel estimates for 2025 Buena Vista ISD and 2026 Fort Stockton ISD, not a county total or owner-level result.
Read article →The plan prints mineral valuation from January through May, but its January 1 effective date and later workflow are document statements, not proof of an owner-level result.
Read article →The official RFP prints different proposal dates on physical pages 4, 8, and 22. Preserve each string, treat the conflict as unresolved, and verify current instructions with Midland CAD.
Read article →Start with Midland CAD’s file-layout PDF, use the recap only for aggregates, and stop before opening owner-level TXT or CSV rows without a defined need and privacy plan.
Read article →Midland CAD places its preliminary mineral roll, certified mineral roll, and mineral notices in different Open Records sections. Those routes do not validate a property record.
Read article →Midland CAD’s 2025 report places an approximately 419,660 mineral interest accounts statement on physical PDF page 25. The figure is not a count of owners, tracts, wells, acreage, or current accounts.
Read article →Midland CAD names three mineral property appraisal approaches, but its page conditions their consideration on sufficient data and does not identify an account-specific method.
Read article →Use Martin CAD lease and property-search fields to reproduce a retrieval route, then stop before treating the interface as ownership or title proof.
Read article →Find the Martin CAD general plan’s mineral-work handoff, then keep the separate contractor plan as its own unresolved source identity.
Read article →Locate the Martin CAD MIUP plan’s mineral-interest section, then keep its interest-versus-mineral wording inside the plan’s source boundary.
Read article →Find the Martin CAD 2025 Category G oil-and-gas row, then keep its parcel count and market value within the report-level aggregate boundary.
Read article →Preserve the Martin CAD certified-link versus preliminary-PDF conflict as two separate observations, then route the status question without exposing record pages.
Read article →Use the page-1 selection map for the Loving CAD 2026 year-by-year appraisals PDF without exposing or interpreting record-specific report pages.
Read article →Use an eight-page physical locator for the Loving CAD 2026 mineral file-layout PDF while preserving its unresolved SITUS and EOF boundary mismatch.
Read article →Use a physical-page map to locate the official Loving CAD 2026 mineral recap labels without converting them into value or property conclusions.
Read article →Map the exact seven members in the Loving CAD 2026 mineral-roll ZIP while keeping file identity separate from data meaning or property conclusions.
Read article →Crosswalk the Loving CAD 2026 report roster from physical PDF page 11 to printed page 10 without turning document labels into current-status or property claims.
Read article →Preserve the Karnes CAD 2026 mineral-roll ZIP identity and seven-member container inventory without opening or applying member data.
Read article →Preserve the Karnes CAD publisher label, Corrected ZIP target, exact archive identity, and seven-member inventory without reading or applying row data.
Read article →Use the cover and physical page 20 of the Karnes CAD 2024 Mass Appraisal Report to preserve an unresolved county-name mismatch without correcting it.
Read article →Use physical pages 22-23 of the Karnes CAD 2025-2026 reappraisal plan to read the district activity bands without inventing a personal deadline.
Read article →Use physical page 3 of the Karnes CAD 2024 annual report to keep its Category G parcel/value row separate from its ratio-study row.
Read article →A source-controlled index of the Howard CAD 2026 certified mineral-roll ZIP and its 16 outer members, without extracting or reading any member.
Read article →