MRX Learning Center
Reeves CAD 2024 Ratio Study: 66 Category G Ratios
The Reeves CAD 2024 ratio-study summary displays 66 Category G ratios and six adjacent aggregate fields that must remain inside their official district-study context.
Direct answer for mineral owners
The official Reeves Appraisal District 2024 ratio-study summary displays 66 in the G.OIL, GAS, MINERALS Number of Ratios field. The same aggregate row displays CAD reported appraisal value 26,799,785,533, median level 1.00, coefficient of dispersion 0.94, 100.00 percent within both displayed median bands, and price-related differential 1.00. These are appraisal-district ratio-study fields, not a parcel count or a private mineral-interest value.
Key takeaways for mineral owners
- The official 2024 findings page establishes the tax year, publication date, and 195 Reeves route; the district summary supplies the row.
- The Category G row displays 66 as Number of Ratios, not as a parcel, owner, account, lease, or well count.
- Keep all seven row fields attached to their exact labels and the 2024 Reeves district-summary identity.
- CAD reported appraisal value is an aggregate study field and does not state what a named owner’s mineral interest is worth.
- Do not recalculate, grade, trend, or apply the displayed statistics to a property, tax, protest, offer, or sale decision.
Aggregate ratio-study record, not a private mineral appraisal. This page reports bounded fields from official Texas Comptroller sources. It does not identify an owner, parcel, mineral account, title, acreage, lease, well, production interest, appraisal notice, tax bill, protest result, market value, private mineral-interest value, offer, buyer action, or transaction result. MRX provides educational information and resources only and does not buy mineral rights.
The direct answer is: the Reeves Appraisal District 2024 ratio-study summary displays 66 in the G.OIL, GAS, MINERALS row’s Number of Ratios field. The same aggregate row displays 26,799,785,533 as 2024 CAD Reported Appraisal Value, 1.00 as median level of appraisal, 0.94 as coefficient of dispersion, 100.00 in both displayed within-median percentage fields, and 1.00 as price-related differential.
Keep every number attached to its label. Sixty-six is the number of ratios, not a parcel count. The reported appraisal value is a district-study field, not a private mineral-interest value.
Direct answer: read all seven fields as one row
The official Reeves summary presents one aggregate Category G row across seven data columns:
| Displayed column | Displayed value |
|---|---|
| Number of Ratios | 66 |
| 2024 CAD Reported Appraisal Value | 26,799,785,533 |
| Median Level of Appraisal | 1.00 |
| Coefficient of Dispersion | 0.94 |
| Percent of ratios within plus or minus 10 percent of median | 100.00 |
| Percent of ratios within plus or minus 25 percent of median | 100.00 |
| Price-Related Differential | 1.00 |
This is a transcription of the displayed district-summary row. It is not a reconstruction of underlying observations, a property sample, a list of accounts, or an MRX score.
Start with the official 2024 route
The Texas Comptroller 2024 Appraisal District Ratio Study findings page identifies the page as 2024 Tax Year Findings, says the information was published on August 15, 2025 in compliance with Tax Code Section 5.10, and lists 195 Reeves among the appraisal districts studied.
That page establishes three source-control facts: the study year, the publication date, and the link relationship to the Reeves summary. It does not supply a property result. Preserve the landing-page URL and the exact Reeves link target instead of citing the district table without its study-set route.
The current Texas Comptroller Reeves County directory identifies Reeves Appraisal District and displayed a May 7, 2026 update date during the controlled retrieval. The directory supports current district identity and contact routing only. It does not independently validate the historical ratio row or any private property conclusion.
Preserve the district-summary identity
The linked 195-Reeves 2024 Appraisal District Summary Worksheet displays:
- study identity:
2024 Appraisal District Ratio Study; - worksheet identity:
Appraisal District Summary Worksheet; - district:
195-Reeves; and - update label:
Study Results Last Updated: Aug. 31, 2025.
The tax year, publication date, and displayed update date are different fields. Do not silently replace 2024 with 2025, and do not describe the page-update date as the effective date of every underlying appraisal or property fact.
Sixty-six is the number of ratios, not a parcel count
The table heading says Number of Ratios **; the Category G row displays 66 under that heading. This article does not relabel 66 as the number of parcels, owners, mineral accounts, leases, wells, samples, sales, notices, offers, or transactions.
The district page does not publish the underlying 66 observations in this summary. Without those records and a separately authorized analysis, the row cannot support property matching, recomputation, or a claim about what any single observation represents.
The page also carries a general warning that statistical measures may not be reliable when the sample is small. Preserve that warning with the source record. This article does not decide whether the warning applies to the Reeves Category G row or whether 66 is sufficient for another purpose.
Keep the reported appraisal value inside the study
26,799,785,533 appears under 2024 CAD Reported Appraisal Value. That label matters. The number is not presented on this page as:
- a named owner’s mineral-rights value;
- a parcel, account, lease, well, or royalty value;
- a private market appraisal;
- an estimated sale price or offer;
- a tax bill or taxable amount for a named property; or
- a total that this article combines with the two school-district PVS figures.
A district-level field and a private mineral-interest question have different evidence requirements. Before anyone could analyze a particular interest, they would need separately verified ownership, legal description, interest type, decimal, production relationship, burdens, effective date, and purpose. This ratio-study row supplies none of those facts.
Do not convert 1.00 into a property finding
The Category G row displays 1.00 in both Median Level of Appraisal and Price-Related Differential. It also displays 0.94 for Coefficient of Dispersion and 100.00 in each of the two within-median percentage columns.
The Texas Comptroller ratio-study overview says the program measures appraisal uniformity and median levels within major property categories using statistical analysis of data collected through the school-district PVS. It identifies median level, coefficient of dispersion, and other statistical measures as report components.
That program description does not turn a displayed aggregate number into a property conclusion. This article therefore does not call any field a pass, guarantee, accuracy certificate, market signal, sale indicator, tax result, or proof that a named account is correct. It does not recalculate, round, normalize, benchmark, rank, grade, trend, or compare the Reeves fields.
Use a citation record that survives reuse
A citation-ready capture should keep these fields together:
| Capture field | Required entry |
|---|---|
| Study set | 2024 Tax Year Findings |
| Publication date | August 15, 2025 |
| District route | 195 Reeves |
| Worksheet | Appraisal District Summary Worksheet |
| Displayed update label | Aug. 31, 2025 |
| Category row | G.OIL, GAS, MINERALS |
| Data fields | All seven labels and displayed values |
| Retrieval record | URL, date, time, timezone, and controlled evidence pointer |
| Stop condition | No owner- or property-level inference |
This structure helps a human reviewer or answer system preserve the issuer, year, district, table role, label, and limitation. A number detached from those qualifiers is easier to misquote.
Keep adjacent Reeves articles in their lanes
Use Reeves County 2024 Category G Worksheets: Two ISDs, Strata, and Ratios for the two school-district PVS worksheet structures, G1 strata, and sample-versus-stratum fields. Article 295 does not reproduce those property rows or combine either district’s PVS figures.
Use Reeves CAD 2025 MAP Review: Four Passes and Two Recommendations for governance and operating-process review results. Use Reeves County 2025 Preliminary PVS: Two Category G Totals for the two preliminary school-district summary rows. Use Reeves County Mineral Records: A Source-by-Source Search Log for clerk, CAD, GLO, and RRC retrieval separation.
Those pages answer different evidence jobs. Article 295 owns only the statewide ratio-study route and one aggregate Reeves appraisal-district row.
Controlled retrieval record
Four official source objects were retrieved on August 31, 2026 and retained as 495,256 controlled bytes.
| Source object | Bytes | SHA-256 prefix | Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 ratio-study findings | 129,419 | bcdebb9f7c70 | Tax year, publication date, Reeves route |
| Reeves 2024 ratio-study summary | 121,572 | 5384e9471894 | Aggregate Category G row |
| Ratio-study overview | 122,827 | c179d89ac270 | Program purpose and measure types |
| Reeves county directory | 121,438 | 855aac8b9438 | Current district identity route |
Claim ledger and stop conditions
| Claim ID | Supported statement | Allowed evidence label | Stop condition |
|---|---|---|---|
C295-01 | Findings page identifies the 2024 tax year | STUDY-IDENTITY | Do not replace the study year with a later update year |
C295-02 | Findings were published August 15, 2025 | PUBLICATION-DATE | Do not call this a property effective date |
C295-03 | Findings page routes to 195 Reeves | ROUTE-INVENTORY | Do not infer property coverage |
C295-04 | Reeves summary displays 66 ratios | AGGREGATE-ROW | Do not relabel 66 as a parcel or owner count |
C295-05 | CAD reported appraisal value is 26,799,785,533 | AGGREGATE-ROW | Do not call it private mineral value |
C295-06 | Median level is 1.00 | DISPLAYED-MEASURE | Do not infer a property finding or pass |
C295-07 | Coefficient of dispersion is 0.94 | DISPLAYED-MEASURE | Do not grade, benchmark, or recompute |
C295-08 | Both within-median fields are 100.00 | DISPLAYED-MEASURE | Do not apply the percentage to a named property |
C295-09 | Price-related differential is 1.00 | DISPLAYED-MEASURE | Do not confuse it with a commodity or price differential |
C295-10 | The row is aggregate district evidence | DOCUMENT-CONTENT | Require separate property evidence before owner-level use |
Practical conclusion for mineral owners
The Reeves CAD 2024 Category G ratio-study row is useful when every label stays attached. It records 66 ratios and six adjacent aggregate fields. It does not count parcels, value a named mineral interest, validate title or acreage, decide a tax or protest issue, state a market price, or predict an offer.For broader source navigation, use the Texas Mineral Rights Guide. Keep the ratio-study row separate from owner, property, appraisal, tax, offer, and transaction evidence.
Frequently asked questions
How many ratios appear in the Reeves 2024 Oil, Gas, Minerals row?
The official 195-Reeves district summary displays 66 under Number of Ratios for G.OIL, GAS, MINERALS.
Does 66 mean Reeves CAD counted 66 mineral parcels or owners?
No such inference is made here. The source labels 66 as Number of Ratios. This article does not relabel it as a parcel, owner, account, lease, well, or transaction count.
What appraisal value is displayed in the Reeves Category G row?
The row displays 26,799,785,533 under 2024 CAD Reported Appraisal Value. That is an aggregate appraisal-district ratio-study field, not a private value for a named mineral interest.
What other statistics appear in the row?
The row displays median level of appraisal 1.00, coefficient of dispersion 0.94, 100.00 percent within both the plus-or-minus 10 percent and 25 percent median bands, and price-related differential 1.00.
Does a 1.00 field prove that my mineral account is correct?
No. The displayed fields are aggregate ratio-study measures. The page does not identify an owner or property, establish appraisal correctness, decide a protest, calculate tax, or state private market value.
Sources reviewed for this article
- Texas Comptroller 2024 Appraisal District Ratio Study Findings (accessed 2026-08-31)
- Texas Comptroller 195-Reeves 2024 Appraisal District Summary Worksheet (accessed 2026-08-31)
- Texas Comptroller Appraisal District Ratio Study Results overview (accessed 2026-08-31)
- Texas Comptroller Reeves County appraisal district directory (accessed 2026-08-31)
A practical next step
Put your mineral rights in context.
Every mineral interest, royalty history, and written offer is different. Start with a question, or share what you have for a free underwriter review.
- Free
- Confidential
- No obligation to sell
Ready for a closer look?
Open the Texas Mineral Rights GuideGet a directional range with the assumptions clearly stated.