MRX Learning Center

Reeves CAD 2024 Ratio Study: 66 Category G Ratios

The Reeves CAD 2024 ratio-study summary displays 66 Category G ratios and six adjacent aggregate fields that must remain inside their official district-study context.

Reeves CAD 2024 Ratio Study: 66 Category G Ratios

Direct answer for mineral owners

The official Reeves Appraisal District 2024 ratio-study summary displays 66 in the G.OIL, GAS, MINERALS Number of Ratios field. The same aggregate row displays CAD reported appraisal value 26,799,785,533, median level 1.00, coefficient of dispersion 0.94, 100.00 percent within both displayed median bands, and price-related differential 1.00. These are appraisal-district ratio-study fields, not a parcel count or a private mineral-interest value.

Key takeaways for mineral owners

  • The official 2024 findings page establishes the tax year, publication date, and 195 Reeves route; the district summary supplies the row.
  • The Category G row displays 66 as Number of Ratios, not as a parcel, owner, account, lease, or well count.
  • Keep all seven row fields attached to their exact labels and the 2024 Reeves district-summary identity.
  • CAD reported appraisal value is an aggregate study field and does not state what a named owner’s mineral interest is worth.
  • Do not recalculate, grade, trend, or apply the displayed statistics to a property, tax, protest, offer, or sale decision.
Reeves CAD 2024 Category G ratio study

Aggregate ratio-study record, not a private mineral appraisal. This page reports bounded fields from official Texas Comptroller sources. It does not identify an owner, parcel, mineral account, title, acreage, lease, well, production interest, appraisal notice, tax bill, protest result, market value, private mineral-interest value, offer, buyer action, or transaction result. MRX provides educational information and resources only and does not buy mineral rights.

The direct answer is: the Reeves Appraisal District 2024 ratio-study summary displays 66 in the G.OIL, GAS, MINERALS row’s Number of Ratios field. The same aggregate row displays 26,799,785,533 as 2024 CAD Reported Appraisal Value, 1.00 as median level of appraisal, 0.94 as coefficient of dispersion, 100.00 in both displayed within-median percentage fields, and 1.00 as price-related differential.

Keep every number attached to its label. Sixty-six is the number of ratios, not a parcel count. The reported appraisal value is a district-study field, not a private mineral-interest value.

Direct answer: read all seven fields as one row

The official Reeves summary presents one aggregate Category G row across seven data columns:

Displayed columnDisplayed value
Number of Ratios66
2024 CAD Reported Appraisal Value26,799,785,533
Median Level of Appraisal1.00
Coefficient of Dispersion0.94
Percent of ratios within plus or minus 10 percent of median100.00
Percent of ratios within plus or minus 25 percent of median100.00
Price-Related Differential1.00

This is a transcription of the displayed district-summary row. It is not a reconstruction of underlying observations, a property sample, a list of accounts, or an MRX score.

Start with the official 2024 route

The Texas Comptroller 2024 Appraisal District Ratio Study findings page identifies the page as 2024 Tax Year Findings, says the information was published on August 15, 2025 in compliance with Tax Code Section 5.10, and lists 195 Reeves among the appraisal districts studied.

That page establishes three source-control facts: the study year, the publication date, and the link relationship to the Reeves summary. It does not supply a property result. Preserve the landing-page URL and the exact Reeves link target instead of citing the district table without its study-set route.

The current Texas Comptroller Reeves County directory identifies Reeves Appraisal District and displayed a May 7, 2026 update date during the controlled retrieval. The directory supports current district identity and contact routing only. It does not independently validate the historical ratio row or any private property conclusion.

Preserve the district-summary identity

The linked 195-Reeves 2024 Appraisal District Summary Worksheet displays:

  • study identity: 2024 Appraisal District Ratio Study;
  • worksheet identity: Appraisal District Summary Worksheet;
  • district: 195-Reeves; and
  • update label: Study Results Last Updated: Aug. 31, 2025.

The tax year, publication date, and displayed update date are different fields. Do not silently replace 2024 with 2025, and do not describe the page-update date as the effective date of every underlying appraisal or property fact.

Sixty-six is the number of ratios, not a parcel count

The table heading says Number of Ratios **; the Category G row displays 66 under that heading. This article does not relabel 66 as the number of parcels, owners, mineral accounts, leases, wells, samples, sales, notices, offers, or transactions.

The district page does not publish the underlying 66 observations in this summary. Without those records and a separately authorized analysis, the row cannot support property matching, recomputation, or a claim about what any single observation represents.

The page also carries a general warning that statistical measures may not be reliable when the sample is small. Preserve that warning with the source record. This article does not decide whether the warning applies to the Reeves Category G row or whether 66 is sufficient for another purpose.

Keep the reported appraisal value inside the study

26,799,785,533 appears under 2024 CAD Reported Appraisal Value. That label matters. The number is not presented on this page as:

  • a named owner’s mineral-rights value;
  • a parcel, account, lease, well, or royalty value;
  • a private market appraisal;
  • an estimated sale price or offer;
  • a tax bill or taxable amount for a named property; or
  • a total that this article combines with the two school-district PVS figures.

A district-level field and a private mineral-interest question have different evidence requirements. Before anyone could analyze a particular interest, they would need separately verified ownership, legal description, interest type, decimal, production relationship, burdens, effective date, and purpose. This ratio-study row supplies none of those facts.

Do not convert 1.00 into a property finding

The Category G row displays 1.00 in both Median Level of Appraisal and Price-Related Differential. It also displays 0.94 for Coefficient of Dispersion and 100.00 in each of the two within-median percentage columns.

The Texas Comptroller ratio-study overview says the program measures appraisal uniformity and median levels within major property categories using statistical analysis of data collected through the school-district PVS. It identifies median level, coefficient of dispersion, and other statistical measures as report components.

That program description does not turn a displayed aggregate number into a property conclusion. This article therefore does not call any field a pass, guarantee, accuracy certificate, market signal, sale indicator, tax result, or proof that a named account is correct. It does not recalculate, round, normalize, benchmark, rank, grade, trend, or compare the Reeves fields.

Use a citation record that survives reuse

A citation-ready capture should keep these fields together:

Capture fieldRequired entry
Study set2024 Tax Year Findings
Publication dateAugust 15, 2025
District route195 Reeves
WorksheetAppraisal District Summary Worksheet
Displayed update labelAug. 31, 2025
Category rowG.OIL, GAS, MINERALS
Data fieldsAll seven labels and displayed values
Retrieval recordURL, date, time, timezone, and controlled evidence pointer
Stop conditionNo owner- or property-level inference

This structure helps a human reviewer or answer system preserve the issuer, year, district, table role, label, and limitation. A number detached from those qualifiers is easier to misquote.

Keep adjacent Reeves articles in their lanes

Use Reeves County 2024 Category G Worksheets: Two ISDs, Strata, and Ratios for the two school-district PVS worksheet structures, G1 strata, and sample-versus-stratum fields. Article 295 does not reproduce those property rows or combine either district’s PVS figures.

Use Reeves CAD 2025 MAP Review: Four Passes and Two Recommendations for governance and operating-process review results. Use Reeves County 2025 Preliminary PVS: Two Category G Totals for the two preliminary school-district summary rows. Use Reeves County Mineral Records: A Source-by-Source Search Log for clerk, CAD, GLO, and RRC retrieval separation.

Those pages answer different evidence jobs. Article 295 owns only the statewide ratio-study route and one aggregate Reeves appraisal-district row.

Controlled retrieval record

Four official source objects were retrieved on August 31, 2026 and retained as 495,256 controlled bytes.

Source objectBytesSHA-256 prefixRole
2024 ratio-study findings129,419bcdebb9f7c70Tax year, publication date, Reeves route
Reeves 2024 ratio-study summary121,5725384e9471894Aggregate Category G row
Ratio-study overview122,827c179d89ac270Program purpose and measure types
Reeves county directory121,438855aac8b9438Current district identity route

Claim ledger and stop conditions

Claim IDSupported statementAllowed evidence labelStop condition
C295-01Findings page identifies the 2024 tax yearSTUDY-IDENTITYDo not replace the study year with a later update year
C295-02Findings were published August 15, 2025PUBLICATION-DATEDo not call this a property effective date
C295-03Findings page routes to 195 ReevesROUTE-INVENTORYDo not infer property coverage
C295-04Reeves summary displays 66 ratiosAGGREGATE-ROWDo not relabel 66 as a parcel or owner count
C295-05CAD reported appraisal value is 26,799,785,533AGGREGATE-ROWDo not call it private mineral value
C295-06Median level is 1.00DISPLAYED-MEASUREDo not infer a property finding or pass
C295-07Coefficient of dispersion is 0.94DISPLAYED-MEASUREDo not grade, benchmark, or recompute
C295-08Both within-median fields are 100.00DISPLAYED-MEASUREDo not apply the percentage to a named property
C295-09Price-related differential is 1.00DISPLAYED-MEASUREDo not confuse it with a commodity or price differential
C295-10The row is aggregate district evidenceDOCUMENT-CONTENTRequire separate property evidence before owner-level use

Practical conclusion for mineral owners

The Reeves CAD 2024 Category G ratio-study row is useful when every label stays attached. It records 66 ratios and six adjacent aggregate fields. It does not count parcels, value a named mineral interest, validate title or acreage, decide a tax or protest issue, state a market price, or predict an offer.

For broader source navigation, use the Texas Mineral Rights Guide. Keep the ratio-study row separate from owner, property, appraisal, tax, offer, and transaction evidence.

Frequently asked questions

How many ratios appear in the Reeves 2024 Oil, Gas, Minerals row?

The official 195-Reeves district summary displays 66 under Number of Ratios for G.OIL, GAS, MINERALS.

Does 66 mean Reeves CAD counted 66 mineral parcels or owners?

No such inference is made here. The source labels 66 as Number of Ratios. This article does not relabel it as a parcel, owner, account, lease, well, or transaction count.

What appraisal value is displayed in the Reeves Category G row?

The row displays 26,799,785,533 under 2024 CAD Reported Appraisal Value. That is an aggregate appraisal-district ratio-study field, not a private value for a named mineral interest.

What other statistics appear in the row?

The row displays median level of appraisal 1.00, coefficient of dispersion 0.94, 100.00 percent within both the plus-or-minus 10 percent and 25 percent median bands, and price-related differential 1.00.

Does a 1.00 field prove that my mineral account is correct?

No. The displayed fields are aggregate ratio-study measures. The page does not identify an owner or property, establish appraisal correctness, decide a protest, calculate tax, or state private market value.

Sources reviewed for this article

A practical next step

Put your mineral rights in context.

Every mineral interest, royalty history, and written offer is different. Start with a question, or share what you have for a free underwriter review.

  • Free
  • Confidential
  • No obligation to sell

Ready for a closer look?

Open the Texas Mineral Rights Guide

Get a directional range with the assumptions clearly stated.

or start with a question
Not ready to share documents? Travis can help you figure out what matters first.