DeWitt CAD 2024-25 MAP Review Source Record

Direct answer for mineral owners

The Texas Comptroller’s 2024-25 final MAP review for DeWitt CAD records five mandatory PASS results, four activity ratings of Meets All, and No Recommendation in the detailed review. Preserve those literal labels with the exact report, page locators, file hash, and retrieval date; do not apply them to a property, mineral value, tax, protest, offer, or sale.

Key takeaways for mineral owners

• Begin with the Texas Comptroller MAP overview and 2025 results page, then preserve the exact linked DeWitt report as a separate source object.
• The 15-page official report identifies itself as the 2024-25 final review and records its summary on PDF page 2.
• Page 2 displays five mandatory PASS labels and four activity ratings of Meets All; those are report labels, not an independent MRX certification.
• Pages 3 through 15 display the Tier 3 question detail, with Yes or N/A answers and No Recommendation in every visible recommendation cell.
• Do not compare years or districts, recalculate a score, combine the review with the DeWitt annual-report G1 row, or infer any owner-specific result.
• Stop before property matching, appraisal judgment, tax or protest guidance, mineral valuation, offer review, or sale advice.

MAP-review boundary. This page preserves the current official Texas Comptroller Methods and Assistance Program source chain, exact DeWitt final-review PDF, complete-file identity, page locators, literal review labels, and retrieval provenance. It does not independently audit or certify the district, search a property, judge an appraisal, determine a tax or protest result, estimate mineral value, evaluate an offer, advise a sale, or promise an outcome. MRX provides educational information and resources only and does not buy mineral rights.

The official DeWitt CAD 2025 MAP review is a 15-page Texas Comptroller report titled 2024-25 Final Methods and Assistance Program Review. Its summary page records five mandatory results as PASS, four activity ratings as Meets All, and four area rows with displayed scores of 100. The detailed Tier 3 pages show Yes or N/A answers and No Recommendation in every visible recommendation cell.

Those are the report’s labels. They do not prove the accuracy, fairness, value, tax treatment, protest posture, or sale potential of any property or mineral interest.

Start with the official MAP source chain

The Texas Comptroller Methods and Assistance Program overview says Tax Code Section 5.102 requires review of each appraisal district’s governance, taxpayer assistance, operating procedures, and appraisal standards, procedures, and methodology at least once every two years. The Comptroller’s Property Tax Assistance Division reviews approximately half of the appraisal districts each year, and the number of questions depends on a three-tier system.

That program page explains purpose and cadence. It does not supply the DeWitt result.

The separate 2025 MAP Review Results page says the listed appraisal-district reviews were completed in 2025 and provides the DeWitt link. Preserve that page because it establishes the current publisher-to-report relationship. A downloaded file alone does not prove where the publisher currently lists it.

Preserve the exact DeWitt report

The exact DeWitt CAD 2024-25 final MAP review PDF returned as a public PDF during the recorded 2026-08-28 review. The complete 15-page file was reviewed visually.

Source field	Source-recorded observation
Cover label	2025 Report: Methods and Assistance Program
Summary title	2024-25 Final Methods and Assistance Program Review
District	DeWitt County Appraisal District
Detailed-review tier	Tier 3
PDF page count	15
Complete-file SHA-256	7602aabbad3f6377d62eb8f72cfcc2a7e37e9e41449ac6b270feea055e9fe8c0
Retrieved	2026-08-28

The hash identifies the complete retrieved file. It does not declare that the report will never change or that another URL is equivalent. If the publisher replaces the file, preserve the new retrieval date and hash instead of silently overwriting the prior record.

Read the page-2 summary literally

PDF page 2 displays five mandatory questions. The result column shows PASS for each:

• administrative functions under the cited Chapter 6 requirement;
• up-to-date appraisal maps;
• current implementation of the most recent reappraisal plan;
• up-to-date appraisal records and the stated procedures and practices; and
• reproducibility using written procedures and appraisal records.

The same page displays four activity ratings:

Review area	Displayed rating
Governance	Meets All
Taxpayer Assistance	Meets All
Operating Procedures	Meets All
Appraisal Standards, Procedures and Methodology	Meets All

The report defines Meets All as a total point score of 100. It then displays these area rows:

Review area	Questions excluding N/A	Yes points	Displayed score
Governance	17	17	100
Taxpayer Assistance	13	13	100
Operating Procedures	23	23	100
Appraisal Standards, Procedures and Methodology	25	25	100

This source record transcribes the table. It does not recompute the score, create a combined total, compare another district or year, or convert a district-level label into an owner-specific conclusion.

Keep the detailed review attached to its page range

PDF pages 3 through 15 identify the detailed instrument as a 2024-25 Final Methods and Assistance Program Tier 3 Review. The numbered review questions run from 1 through 88 across governance, taxpayer assistance, operating procedures, and appraisal standards, procedures, and methodology.

Applicable answers are displayed as Yes; identified inapplicable answers are displayed as N/A. Every visible recommendation cell reads No Recommendation. Preserve those exact labels and the page range. Do not replace them with an unsourced claim that the district is perfect, flawless, universally compliant, or guaranteed to produce accurate appraisals.

The current Guide to the Comptroller Methods and Assistance Program explains that reviewers evaluate district documentation and conduct onsite interviews, use mandatory pass/fail and yes/no questions, and publish final reviews after the review cycle. That process context does not add a property result or expand the meaning of the DeWitt report.

Separate the MAP review from the annual-report G1 row

The DeWitt CAD 2025 G1 annual-report source record owns a different document, publisher relationship, page, and field set. Its countywide G1 row does not supply evidence for this Comptroller MAP review. The MAP review does not validate, explain, or convert the annual-report row.

Do not combine the sources to calculate a score, judge a mineral category, infer appraisal accuracy, estimate a property value, evaluate a protest, or support an offer. A shared district name does not make two separate official publications analytically interchangeable.

Use document-control states, not conclusions

Assign one of these states to a source item:

• source-recorded: the exact source URL, label, retrieval date, page locator, and visible observation were preserved;
• not-displayed: the current source did not visibly display the expected label or field;
• source-conflict: two preserved official sources display different identities, dates, labels, URLs, or results;
• controlled-record-stop: continuing would require a property record, private data, calculation, matching, comparison, or analysis outside this article; or
• authorized-human-stop: the question requires an authorized owner, appraiser, tax professional, attorney, or another qualified reviewer.

These states describe document control. They do not mean accurate, inaccurate, valid for a property, legally controlling, appraised, taxable, protestable, valuable, accepted, fair, or recommended.

Stop before owner-specific use

The MAP report does not answer what one mineral interest is worth or whether a particular appraisal is correct. Stop before:

• searching an owner, account, address, lease, well, property, or legal description;
• treating a district-level review label as proof about a specific property or mineral category;
• adding the MAP results to an appraisal notice, annual-report row, tax statement, production record, royalty statement, valuation, or offer;
• recalculating, aggregating, normalizing, benchmarking, ranking, trending, or comparing the displayed findings;
• deciding whether to protest, pay tax, accept an offer, sell, retain, lease, or transfer mineral rights; or
• contacting an office, submitting a record, making a payment, negotiating, or promising an outcome.

A qualified review may use other records for a different purpose, but that work must preserve its own authority, privacy, assumptions, dates, and limitations.

Final source-record checklist

Before retaining this locator, verify that:

• the Comptroller MAP overview and 2025 results URLs still resolve through HTTPS;
• the results page still lists and links the DeWitt report;
• the exact PDF URL, page count, complete-file hash, and retrieval date are preserved;
• the report cover, page-2 summary, and pages 3 through 15 were checked visually;
• the five mandatory PASS labels and four Meets All labels are transcribed without added meaning;
• the four area rows remain attached to their exact headings and displayed fields;
• Yes, N/A, and No Recommendation remain literal report labels;
• the MAP review stays separate from the annual-report G1 row and every property record;
• no district comparison, year-over-year trend, recalculation, appraisal judgment, tax conclusion, protest position, mineral valuation, offer, or sale advice was added; and
• the next step becomes a controlled record or authorized human stop when the question leaves this narrow source boundary.

The useful deliverable is deliberately limited: one official DeWitt MAP-review source record with its publisher relationship, complete-file identity, page locators, literal results, process context, and stop conditions intact. It helps a reader locate and cite the official report without pretending that district-level review findings answer a property, appraisal, tax, protest, mineral-value, offer, or sale question.

Frequently asked questions

Where is the official DeWitt CAD 2024-25 MAP review?

Use the Texas Comptroller 2025 MAP Review Results page to preserve the publisher relationship, then retain the exact linked DeWitt PDF. The PDF is the official report; the results page proves how the Comptroller currently presents the link.

What does the DeWitt MAP review summary record?

PDF page 2 records five mandatory requirements as PASS and rates Governance, Taxpayer Assistance, Operating Procedures, and Appraisal Standards, Procedures and Methodology as Meets All. These are literal report labels, not an independent MRX certification.

Did the detailed review include recommendations?

Across PDF pages 3 through 15, every visible recommendation cell reads No Recommendation. Applicable question answers are displayed as Yes, while identified inapplicable questions are displayed as N/A.

Does the MAP review prove that a mineral appraisal is accurate?

No. This source record does not use district-level review labels to certify a specific appraisal, property record, mineral interest, tax amount, protest position, valuation, offer, or sale result.

Can the MAP review be combined with DeWitt annual-report mineral figures?

Not in this source record. The MAP review and the annual-report G1 row are different sources with different purposes. Combining, comparing, or applying them would require a separately authorized analysis with its own evidence and limitations.

Sources reviewed for this article

• Texas Comptroller, Methods and Assistance Program (accessed 2026-08-28)
• Texas Comptroller, 2025 MAP Review Results (accessed 2026-08-28)
• Texas Comptroller, DeWitt CAD 2024-25 Final MAP Review (accessed 2026-08-28)
• Texas Comptroller, Guide to the Methods and Assistance Program (accessed 2026-08-28)