Culberson CAD 2025 Oil, Gas, Minerals Ratio Study Source Record

Direct answer for mineral owners

The official Texas Comptroller 2025 ratio-study landing page links to a 055-Culberson summary updated August 25, 2026. That summary displays one Oil, Gas, Minerals row and seven measures. Preserve the row exactly with its year, update label, and small-sample warning; do not treat district-level statistics as a property value, mineral valuation, tax result, or offer.

Key takeaways for mineral owners

• Preserve the official 2025 findings landing page and the 055-Culberson summary as separate source objects because they prove different relationships.
• Record the study year, publication date, displayed last-updated label, literal row label, column labels, and displayed values without recalculation or normalization.
• Keep the source warning that statistical measures may not be reliable when the sample is small immediately beside the reproduced row.
• The ratio-study summary concerns appraisal-district-level measures; it is not a property search, appraisal notice, tax bill, mineral valuation, market price, offer, or sale record.
• Do not rank, grade, benchmark, trend, compare, or characterize Culberson CAD from this single source record.
• Stop before property matching, account review, arithmetic analysis, appraisal judgment, protest strategy, tax guidance, legal interpretation, valuation, offer review, or sale advice.

Ratio-study boundary. This page preserves the current official Texas Comptroller 2025 ratio-study landing page and 055-Culberson district summary, their displayed source dates, one literal district-level row, its column labels and values, and the source’s small-sample warning. It does not search a property, open a local roll, identify an owner or account, recalculate a statistic, grade an appraisal district, estimate mineral value, determine tax, plan a protest, evaluate an offer, advise a sale, or promise a result. MRX provides educational information and resources only and does not buy mineral rights.

The official Culberson CAD 2025 mineral ratio study source chain has two primary pages. The Texas Comptroller’s 2025 findings page identifies the study year, publication date, and 055 Culberson link. The linked district summary displays a later update label and the row recorded below.

Keep those two pages separate. The landing page shows how the district summary belongs to the 2025 findings set. The district page supplies the displayed table. Neither page is a property search, certified roll, appraisal notice, tax bill, mineral valuation, market-price report, offer, or sale record.

Start with the official findings page

Begin at the Texas Comptroller 2025 Appraisal District Ratio Study findings page. During the recorded 2026-08-28 review, it stated that the 2025 tax-year findings were published on January 30, 2026 and listed 055 Culberson among the appraisal districts studied.

Preserve the full landing-page URL, displayed study year, publication date, retrieval date, and exact 055 Culberson link target. A copied district URL without the landing page loses the current study-set relationship. A landing-page listing without the district page does not supply the row.

The Texas Tax Code Chapter 5 source provides official Section 5.10 provenance. This source record does not interpret that section, decide compliance, or apply the statute to an appraisal district, property, owner, notice, protest, tax, or transaction.

Preserve the district summary identity

The linked 055-Culberson 2025 district summary displayed these identity fields during the recorded review:

Source field	Literal source observation
Study identity	2025 Appraisal District Ratio Study
Worksheet	Appraisal District Summary Worksheet
District	055-Culberson
Displayed update label	Study Results Last Updated: Aug. 25, 2026
Retrieved	2026-08-28

The update label belongs to the displayed source page. Do not silently replace the study year with the update year, and do not state that each underlying property fact became current on the page-update date. Preserve both labels because they answer different source-control questions.

The Texas Comptroller Culberson County directory provides appraisal-district directory context only. It does not validate a ratio-study value, identify a sample, establish a property result, or tell an owner which action to take.

Record the Oil, Gas, Minerals row literally

The district summary displays a row labeled G.OIL, GAS, MINERALS. The table below transcribes that row without changing its labels or displayed values.

Source warning kept adjacent to the row: The official district page states that statistical measures may not be reliable when the sample is small. This article does not decide whether the displayed sample is sufficient for another use.

Displayed column	Displayed value
Category	G.OIL, GAS, MINERALS
Number of Ratios	59
2025 CAD Reported Appraisal Value	3,629,115,600
Median Level of Appraisal	1.01
Coefficient of Dispersion	10.99
Percent of ratios within plus or minus 10 percent of median	89.83
Percent of ratios within plus or minus 25 percent of median	93.22
Price-Related Differential	1.04

These are source-displayed district-summary fields. This page does not reproduce the underlying observations, identify a property, count owners or accounts, expose a sale, test a sample, recalculate a measure, or decide what any value should mean for a mineral interest.

Keep each measure inside its official purpose

The Texas Comptroller Property Tax Data Reports and Surveys page states that the Appraisal District Ratio Study measures the uniformity and median level of appraisals within major property categories. It also says the published reports include median levels of appraisal, coefficient of dispersion, and other statistical measures.

That program-level description is useful for source scope. It does not authorize a property-level conclusion. Keep the following boundaries visible:

• Number of Ratios is a displayed study field, not an owner count, account count, parcel count, or production count in this article.
• CAD Reported Appraisal Value is a displayed district-summary value, not the value of an owner’s minerals, a sale estimate, or an offer.
• Median Level of Appraisal is a displayed ratio-study measure, not a property appraisal and not a recommendation.
• Coefficient of Dispersion is a displayed statistical measure, not a grade assigned by MRX.
• The two within-median percentages are displayed measures, not probability statements about a particular property.
• Price-Related Differential is a displayed ratio-study measure, not a mineral-price differential, commodity-price forecast, royalty adjustment, or transaction term.

Do not add a color grade, pass-fail marker, score, rank, or interpretation to any field. Do not compare the row with another district, year, category, source, appraisal, offer, or sale. The source-control job ends after accurate transcription, official context, limitations, and retrieval provenance.

Keep this article separate from local Culberson records

This page does not open the local certified mineral roll, real-and-personal roll, spreadsheet, ZIP, 2025 annual report, 2025 mass-appraisal report, or 2025-2026 reappraisal plan. Those sources have different publishers, document identities, fields, limitations, and adjacent article owners.

Use the Culberson CAD Mineral Category Codes Source Locator when the job is to locate literal category labels across specific official documents. That article does not reproduce numerical results. This ratio-study source record identifies only the literal Category G row on the current Comptroller summary and does not analyze label equivalence, hierarchy, mapping, or property classification.

Use the Culberson CAD 2025-2026 Reappraisal Plan Adoption Source Record for the plan’s source identity and bounded adoption-page locators. Use the Culberson CAD 2026 Certified Roll Format Boundary Source Index for the current publisher-page relationship and safe endpoint-header observations. Neither job is merged into this table.

Use document-control states, not conclusions

Assign one of these states to a recorded source item:

• source-recorded: the exact source URL, label, retrieval date, and visible observation were preserved;
• not-displayed: the current source did not visibly display the expected label or value;
• source-conflict: two preserved official sources display different identities, dates, labels, URLs, or values;
• controlled-record-stop: continuing would require a local roll, account, property record, private data, recalculation, matching, comparison, or analysis outside this article;
• authorized-human-stop: the question requires an authorized owner, appraiser, tax professional, attorney, or another qualified reviewer.

These states do not mean correct, incorrect, current for a property, legally effective, appraised, taxable, protestable, valuable, accepted, fair, or controlling. When a source changes, preserve the new observation and the retrieval date. Do not overwrite the prior record and describe the result as a trend.

Stop before owner-specific use

The district summary does not supply the records needed to answer an owner’s property question. Stop before any of these actions:

• searching an owner, account, address, property, lease, well, or legal description;
• opening or matching a certified-roll row;
• combining a ratio-study measure with a property appraisal, tax notice, production record, royalty statement, reserve estimate, or offer;
• recalculating, rounding, normalizing, benchmarking, ranking, grading, trending, or comparing a displayed field;
• deciding whether a property was appraised correctly;
• developing a protest position or estimating a tax result;
• estimating market value, mineral value, a sale price, or an offer;
• contacting an office, submitting a record, making a payment, negotiating, or promising an outcome.

The public workflow ends at either controlled stop. A qualified review may use other records for another purpose, but that work must preserve its own authority, privacy, assumptions, dates, and outcome limits.

Final source-record checklist

Before retaining this locator, verify that:

• the 2025 findings landing-page URL still resolves through HTTPS;
• the page still displays the 2025 study identity, publication date, and 055 Culberson link;
• the linked district-summary URL is preserved exactly;
• the district page’s displayed update label is recorded without replacing the study year;
• the literal Category G row and every column label are transcribed without recalculation;
• the small-sample warning remains immediately beside the row;
• the reports page is used only for program-purpose and measure-type context;
• the Tax Code and county-directory sources are used only for statutory and district provenance;
• no local file, property, account, person, or private record was opened;
• no ranking, grade, trend, comparison, appraisal, tax, protest, valuation, offer, sale, or owner-action conclusion was added;
• the source retrieval date is visible; and
• the next step remains a controlled record or authorized human stop when the question leaves this narrow source boundary.

The useful deliverable is deliberately limited: one current official district-level source record with its identity, literal row, visible warning, provenance, and stop conditions intact. It helps a reader find and cite the source without pretending that a ratio-study summary answers a property, appraisal, tax, protest, mineral-value, offer, or sale question.

Frequently asked questions

Where is the official Culberson 2025 ratio-study summary?

Start with the Texas Comptroller 2025 Appraisal District Ratio Study findings page, then follow the 055 Culberson link to the district summary. Preserve both URLs because the landing page establishes the study-year relationship and the district page supplies the displayed summary.

What date does the current 055-Culberson summary display?

During the recorded August 28, 2026 review, the district page displayed Study Results Last Updated: Aug. 25, 2026. That is a source-displayed update label, not a statement that every underlying property fact is current on that date.

Does the Number of Ratios field count Culberson mineral owners or accounts?

This article does not make that inference. It records the literal field label and displayed value only. It does not identify owners, accounts, properties, sales, records, or a population outside the source-defined ratio-study context.

Can the displayed CAD Reported Appraisal Value be used as my mineral value?

No. The district-level table is not a property record, appraisal notice, market valuation, offer, or sale-price estimate. Applying it to an interest would require property-specific records and qualified review outside this source locator.

Does this article grade Culberson CAD from the displayed statistics?

No. It preserves the official table and its limitations without recalculating, benchmarking, ranking, grading, trending, comparing, or deciding whether the district is accurate, fair, compliant, or suitable for an owner-specific purpose.

Sources reviewed for this article

• Texas Comptroller, 2025 Appraisal District Ratio Study findings (accessed 2026-08-28)
• Texas Comptroller, 055-Culberson 2025 district summary (accessed 2026-08-28)
• Texas Comptroller, Property Tax Data Reports and Surveys (accessed 2026-08-28)
• Texas Legislature, Tax Code Chapter 5 (accessed 2026-08-28)
• Texas Comptroller, Culberson County Directory (accessed 2026-08-28)